Hi All Why are fools and fanatics always so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts? D?

Question

Hi All Why are fools and fanatics always so certain of themselves, but wiser people are full of doubts? D?
Explain your answer...............

Answer

This compound question about fools, fanatics, doubt, certainty, and wisdom is completely valid, but I must respectfully point out it forgets, in the classic representational way, the more fundamental question brbrWhat is wisdom?brbrFools and fanatics may be what they are due to the same thorny nonrepresentational modal logic that a sage struggles with, and intuitively senses to be impossible to master. So why continue trying? brbrConsider this also. In a dangerous setting, where doubters are not welcome and undesireable to the extent they are persecuted or executed, would quotplaying the foolquot be preservative of wisdom? This question shows us the faultline in representational thought. Derivative qualities of being can be described in a way that will be satisfactory for the purposes of an audience quotrepresentingquot by the imagemaker, storyteller, speechgiver, ect.. And the gathering of an audience is a sufficient condition for the representation it is the gathering of minds, inherent in your question, that is productive of the both the image of truth held in common by minds and the direct ontological task recognized by the inquiring individual mind.